On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Drew Parsons <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 18:11 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Drew Parsons <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > No worries, thanks Johannes. We'll keep the fenics metapackage. >> > >> > In regards to Andreas' task package, is there any sense putting in >> > two >> > references, one for dolfin and one for fenics? >> > >> > It makes sense to me to just provide one. In that case I'd say the >> > fenics package is the one to list (in the Debian mathematics task), >> > grabbing the whole set of fenics components. >> >> Yes, the fenics package is the one we recommend our users to install. >> In the FEniCS PPA on Launchpad, the fenics meta package also includes >> mshr. >> > > Thanks, I'll pass that recommendation on to Andreas. > > In our fenics package, we could set > Suggests: mshr > (until CGAL liberation is ready in the mshr package) > > That won't get in the way of anything, but it will signal that we do > have mshr available for Debian (in a sense). Users can easily build it > from the git repo.
Yes, that is a good idea. Johannes
