* Andreas Tille <[email protected]> [2017-02-02 08:32]:
[snip] While I usually think that this is not really a big deal
specifically in the sundials case it might be relevant since as we
discussed for the octave interface we might need to rely on the older
version. However, there is no response from the Octave team until now.
Is there any interest from Octave folks (developers & users)?
Sorry for joining the discussion so late.
I have never used octave-sundials myself. I have no strong opinion on
this package, since it is not central to Octave itself. However, since
upstream has dropped the Matlab Toolbox, you guys should just go ahead
and let octave-sundials disappear. There may be users out there that
still need octave-sundials (popcon indicates low numbers. though), but we
can do very little as regards this pacakge.
Best,
Rafael
