Le jeudi 09 février 2017 à 16:13 +0100, Michael Banck a écrit : > I think I read the ATLAS README.Debian and found it a bit more > convoluted than necessary; in particular, I think it creates binary > packages with different names to ones in the official archive (sorry > can't check at the moment as I am on crappy dialup)? Probably just > bumping the binary package version like we do for backports or binNMUs > would be enough.
Actually the package name remains the same as the official package, just the version differs (a suffix is appended to the version number). > A good start would be to both support DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=custom for > generic performance-oriented rebuidls and > DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-march=native for for the -march=native thing. I’m not sure to understand what a “generic performance-oriented rebuild” is. By definition, a performance-oriented rebuild does not create a generic binary, but a target-specific one. However, I agree with you that using DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS rather than a custom rule in debian/rules (as currently implemented) would be a nicer technical solution. I’m going to open a bug against src:atlas to remind myself to make that change for buster. -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://sebastien.villemot.name `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
