Hi, Am Montag, den 08.05.2017, 16:52 +0000 schrieb Nico Schlömer: > Alright, excellent, so we all agree to put it in a new repo. > > Would anyone open one and import the VTK7 from the vtk6 repo? I'll do it, but currently I'm on a volume limited Internet connection (this should change in a few days), so it will take a few days until I can implement it.
BTW: Nico I, ve seen that you changed back to not using system-provided versions for GL2P, LIBPROJ4, and GLEW. Could you be a bit more specific in the changelog about why you did this? Many thanks, Gert > > Cheers, > Nico > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM Anton Gladky <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Nico, I was not quite explicit. I meant to have in a separate > > branch. > > But it is not so critical. > > > > Regards > > > > Anton > > > > > > 2017-05-08 18:28 GMT+02:00 Nico Schlömer <[email protected]> > > : > > > Thanks Gert for the comment. > > > > > > I committed it to the vtk6 repo after consulting with the Anton, > > see [1]. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Nico > > > > > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=0;bug=81025 > > 4;msg=45 > > > > > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:24 PM Gert Wollny <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello Nico, > > >> > > >> I've seen that you have started packaging vtk 7.1 within the > > vtk6 tree, > > >> effectively targeting at replacing vtk 6.3. > > >> > > >> Please don't do this, we might have to package vtk-6.3 and vtk- > > 7.1 in > > >> parallel (at least for some time). For further details see > > >> > > >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2017/04/msg00009.html > > >> > > >> So just like we did with vtk6 vs. vtk5 at least I would prefer > > to > > >> package vtk7 in a separate repository. > > >> > > >> Many thanks, > > >> Gert > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
