Hi all, Le Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:38:41AM +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > > I am ok with keeping for some time the old URLs with anonscm.d.o for existing > packages, since the AliothRewriter makes them work. Once a final decision is > made about the future of anonscm.d.o, we can update them accordingly. > > However note that we have a difficulty for new packages. Suppose that you > introduce a new r-cran-foo package, what URL are you going to use?
I am also not excited by one more round of VCS URL updates. (But I am very excited by the availability of a GitLab server for Debian.) In case the final decision of the anonscm and salsa admins is to require for an URL update, I would tend to wait that `cme fix dpkg-contol`, which I run when I touch an old package, would start to do the work for me. In that sense, I think that it is fine to only update the behaviour of dh-r once other pieces of the ecosystem (cme, lintian, ...) make the transition. Have a nice day, Charles -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
