-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: On fplll 5.2.1 Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:49:17 +0400 From: Jerome BENOIT <jgm...@rezozer.net> Reply-To: jgm...@rezozer.net Organisation: none To: debian-science@lists.debian.org Ok, On 24/05/18 10:38, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi > Le 24 mai 2018 07:03, Jerome BENOIT <calcu...@rezozer.net> a écrit : >> >> I am confused here: >> do you mean that the dependant packages must be uploaded with a build-dep on >> = 5.2.0 ? >> > > The current fpylll isn't compatible with the next fplll, so I think it's > better to reupload it with a cutting dep and let it go to testing. > > When we will be done checking everything is alright in experimental and will > start the transition, the package manager will know what to do. > > Or we might get lucky and the new fpylll will be compatible with both > versions of fplll... > > Is the new fpylll released? Can you check it against the fplll on salsa? I will check this week-end, Jerome > > Cheers, > > Snark > -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
