Sébastien Villemot <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 10:16:18PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote: > >> These packages are not perfect, but I think they're good-enough to push. >> So I just pushed them to the archive. They still need to clear NEW, so >> don't expect them to be installable TOMORROW, but soon. > > I have just seen that you uploaded sundials 3.1 to unstable, without > coordinating the transition. Now this is getting untangled with the octave > transition, and I see that sundials FTBFS on several archs. Sigh. > > Next time, please upload first to experimental, and at least coordinate with > maintainers reverse dependencies.
Yes. Right. I haven't had to think about transitions in the past, and this clearly shows why I should in the future. Sorry. I looked at the sundials FTBFS; looks like some subset of tests is timing out on some arches. I'll look into it. Is there anything in particular I should do to make octave happy again in the near term? dima
