Hi, Ole pointed me to the citation file format[1] which seems to be pretty interesting.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:34:59AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > I'll let you do the job if you like ;-) I've created preliminary packages for doi2cff[2] on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/doi2cff (please note that python3-ruamel.yaml from experimental is needed) $ doi2cff init 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp347 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/doi2cff", line 11, in <module> load_entry_point('doi2cff==1.0.0', 'console_scripts', 'doi2cff')() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 764, in __call__ return self.main(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 717, in main rv = self.invoke(ctx) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 1137, in invoke return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 956, in invoke return ctx.invoke(self.callback, **ctx.params) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 555, in invoke return callback(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/doi2cff/cli.py", line 54, in init raise NotImplemented('Unable to process doi, converter not implemented') TypeError: 'NotImplementedType' object is not callable Is anybody able to verify this? > My main question is: shall we (as Debian) advocate the usage of CFF? I > would very much like to do that, mainly by opening issues and PRs on the > maintained upstream packages and stating that this would help (not only) > Debian to maintain the citations. I'm in favour of this. > This would however mean that we > integrate CFF support. Asking the major drivers (like the astropy > ecosystem in my field) would probably have a pushing effect on others. > And this would bring Debian as one of the big players of CFF. I think this is a good idea. As far as I can see from a quick view stripping some fields from d/u/metadata and adding cff-version: 1.0.3 should do the trick which is pretty easily scriptable (if I'm not missing anything due to my very quick view on it). > @Andreas -- do you plan to have a science of blends BoF? I could then > prepare a small talk to introduce CFF to have a base for an open discussion. Yes, I'll register the usual BoFs. This year my decision to go to DebConf was drawn pretty late - to late for registering any talk. But I plan to register the BoFs for the "inofficial" track. > On 21.06.19 08:21, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Ole, > > > > thanks to the hint to citation-file-format[1] which was new to me. I'm > > really excited about doi2cff[2] and I'll package it in Debian Science if > > you do not confirm that you did some work on this. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Andreas. > > > > [1] https://github.com/citation-file-format/citation-file-format > > [2] https://github.com/citation-file-format/doi2cff > > > -- http://fam-tille.de
