Hello, Right now, I can't dedicate time towards porting ModelBuilder. It should be a quick fix to port to Python3. BIP is already python3 compatible. So whatever you decide is fine with me.
thanks, Flávio Codeço Coelho On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:48 AM Andreas Tille <andr...@fam-tille.de> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:18:38PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > Hi Flávio, > > > > > > Varun Hiremath once cared for Debian packages of ModelBuilder[1]. His > > > effort seemed to have been stalled and so Debian remained at version > > > 0.4.1. In the process of migrating all Debian packages from Python2 to > > > Python3 I stumbled upon this package and moved under Debian Science > > > team maintenance[2]. > > > > > > I realised that version 0.4.6 need a Python module BIP[3]. (BTW, as a > > > general remark: It would be nice if you would keep release tags in sync > > > with PyPI.) Since BIP is not packaged for Debian I would consider > doing > > > so - but only Python3 modules are permitted to go into Debian. Since > > > I'm not sure whether I will reach my original goal to get ModelBuilder > > > converted to Python3 succesfully I wonder whether you can uncover some > > > plan you might have with ModelBuilder whether you want to port it > > > yourself do Python3. > > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > Do you (or Flavio) plan on porting model-builder to Python 3? > > > > If not, I will probably just convert this to an RM request as it seems > > model-builder is unmaintained upstream (and downstream). > > I have no personal interest in ModelBuilder - just spottet it as a > reverse dependency of Python2 scipy and had a look whether we can bump > this to Python3. The effort seemed to be more than a quick shot, > thought. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >
