Uploaded as well. I had almost no questions about your technical packaging level. I would encourage you to apply to a DM-role, if you are interested. I will definitely advocate your application and then give you permissions to upload opm-stuff if you apply.
Cheers Anton Am Fr., 28. Jan. 2022 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt <mar...@dr-blatt.de>: > > Hi Anton, > > thanks a lot for the work. Highly appreciated. > > Did you also upload opm-upscaling to NEW? > > opm-upscaling/2021.10-1 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling > > Did not receibve any notification and can't see. Maybe it just needs more > time for processing? > > Markus > > Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:14:45PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: > >Hi Markus, > > > >done! > > > >Best regards > > > >Anton > > > >Am Mi., 26. Jan. 2022 um 14:44 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt <mar...@dr-blatt.de>: > >> > >> Hi, > >> Am Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:26:09AM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: > >> > > >> >I will upload it in the evening. Please prepare all other involved > >> >packages if any. Thanks. Regards > >> > > >> > >> cool. Thanks in advance. > >> > >> Source uploads needed for migration to testing: > >> - opm-common/2021.10-3 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-common > >> - opm-material/2021.10-2 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-material > >> - opm-models/2021.10-2 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-models > >> > >> > >> These are the ones that were rejected by ftpmaster and copyright should be > >> fixed now. > >> Please upload to new > >> - opm-grid/2021.10-1 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-grid > >> - opm-simulators/2021.10-1 > >> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-simulators > >> - opm-upscaling/2021.10-1 > >> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Markus > >> > >> > >> > > >> >Am Di., 25. Jan. 2022 um 00:00 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt > >> ><mar...@dr-blatt.de>: > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opm-common" to do a source > >> >> upload: > >> >> > >> >> * Package name : opm-common > >> >> Version : 2021.10-3 > >> >> Upstream Author : o...@opm-project.org > >> >> * URL : http://opm-project.org > >> >> * License : GPL-2.0+, GPL-3.0+, ODBL-1.0 and DBCL-1.0 > >> >> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-common > >> >> Section : libs > >> >> > >> >> The package was still not good enough. > >> >> We had limited the architectures in d/control to 64bit, but not in > >> >> d/tests/control and > >> >> that would have prevented the source package from migrating to testing > >> >> as the autopkgtests > >> >> for 32bit would still be executed and fail due to missing binary > >> >> packages. > >> >> > >> >> After a fruitful discussions on the mentors list, see > >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2022/01/msg00185.html, I have > >> >> now > >> >> > >> >> - used "Architecture: any" in d/control to let buildd try to build all > >> >> (32bit builds will fail due to failing ctest) > >> >> - limited to 64bit architectures in d/tests/control to prevent failing > >> >> autopkgtest > >> >> > >> >> I hope that this will allow for migration to testing. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks a lot. > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> > >> >> Markus > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services > >> http://www.dr-blatt.de > >> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany, USt-Id: DE279960836 > >> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858 > > > > -- > > Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de > Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany, USt-Id: DE279960836 > Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
