Hi, Thanks a lot to Scott for the review! @Andreas: Thanks, please go ahead. Ping me if it FTBFS or any patch needs a rebase.
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 17:22 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 03:00:08PM +0000 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > > > Normally for a package already in Debian I wouldn't reject due to > > copyright/ > > license documentation, but I am making an exception is this case. > > I only > > started to look at this package by doing grep -ir copyright * over > > the source. > > I made redirected the output of that to a file and made a list of > > all the > > copyright notices that are not currently reflected in > > debian/copyright. It > > has 806 lines. > > > > It looks clear to me that either the package has been completely > > reworked by > > upstream and the maintainer didn't check or it's been years (looks > > like five) > > since anyone looked at debian/copyright. > > > > Please fix and reupload. This package needs a comprehensive review > > of > > copyright and licensing and the documentation of the results in > > debian/ > > copyright per policy. > > Thanks a lot for your review. I think I've fixed d/copyright in > Git[1]. > > @Mo: I had trouble with pristine-tar to extract the source tarball of > version 2021.4.0-1 which you uploaded. Since there is a new upstream > version meanwhile I'm currently building 2021.5.0-1 with the > intention > to upload it to experimental via NEW. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/tbb/-/blob/master/debian/copyright >
