Hello, >You should have closed them in the upload.
yes my bad, but in any case better an extra check from somebody else hands, I did a *lot* of work on this package, so I might have missed many things... A double check on the sanity of the resulting binary is appreciated :) >Well, precisely, in experimental, the source package name is still called >nlohmann-json3 that one was to test the new autopkgtests, I'm speaking about the experimental branch, the one I'm building right now >Again this is not an option. All you will achieve is packages vendoring >nlohmann-json3 instead of using the package. > >The only option is to work with upstream to commit to a fixed ABI. There is no >point going round and round. Something already nackd by upstream, maybe you can help? https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/4926 G.
