Hello once again, Thanks for accepting the PR's and trigerring a new release.
I believe there's just one thing more, there's a patch being applied on kali's cowpatty which i bet you'd like to add to cowpatty. I talked about that on the #2 PR ( https://github.com/joswr1ght/cowpatty/pull/2#issuecomment-402283071). But the patch seems to be fixing a buffer overflow, I believe it was made by Mati Aharoni <[email protected]> and i found references of the patch in various places online. https://www.question-defense.com/2009/12/24/cowpatty-buffer-overflow You can see here that Arch is also applying the patch ( https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/cowpatty ). What do you think? And once again, thanks for responsiveness. On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 at 18:28, Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Joshua, > > I just sent the second PR which adds a simple manpage for cowpatty and > genpmk based on their help output. > > As i mentioned on the PRs[0][1], it would be very helpful if you could do > a new release after merging both of them. It would be more noticeable if > there was a new release since you changed cowpatty's license, > > Thanks a lot for your responsiveness regarding all of this. > > PS.: I'm not sure if i should be sending this to the two emails of yours > that i found (if not, please say so). And also i'm CCing debian security > tools list, which is public. > > [0]https://github.com/joswr1ght/cowpatty/pull/2 > [1]https://github.com/joswr1ght/cowpatty/pull/3 > -- > Samuel Henrique <samueloph> > -- Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
