Hi David, On Sun, 2026-06-28 at 22:21 -0300, David da Silva Polverari wrote: > Penelope is already packaged for Kali [3], even though I didn't reuse it > and packaged it from scratch. Do you think I should incorporate Kali's > changelog in this case or just keep my packaging as is, considering it > will end up in Kali again by the end?
I would recommend to keep Kali's changelog, to not confuse Kali developers and users. Consider your work a complete overhaul of the packaging currently in Kali. That approach would be in sync with packages like braa [1] or sublist3r [2] which also started its live in Kali. Just my 2 cents. Cheers, Sven [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/braa [2] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/sublist3r -- GPG Fingerprint 3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
