On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:24:10 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Michael S. Gilbert <[email protected]> [2009-08-10 20:18]: > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:09:16 +0000, Nico Golde wrote: > [...] > > > -CVE-2009-2414 > > > +CVE-2009-2414 [libxml2 stack recursion] > > > RESERVED > > > + - libxml2 <unfixed> (medium; bug #540865) > > > + [etch] - libxml <unfixed> > > > > i thought <unfixed> tags for stable releases were discouraged? > > Hmm. I wasn't pretty sure how to mark this. In this case > only etch contains libxml. Would be adding <removed> tags > for lenny and unstable (or is only lenny required in this > case) a better solution in this case? Florian?
i think you would want to do - libxml <removed> [etch] - libxml <no-dsa> (backport not feasible) or something like that. mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
