On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:41:57 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Jérémy Bobbio <[email protected]> [2009-10-30 14:05]: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:39:35AM +0000, DDPOMail robot wrote: > > > === silc-toolkit: > > > = There are 6 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. > > > See > > > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/silc-toolkit > > > > All those issues have been fixed, but CVE were not referenced in the > > Debian changelog (as the actual update made the security team register > > new CVEs). > > > > Could you please update the security tracker regarding this issues? > > No. If you check the CVE ids in detail you will see that those issues are > unfixed in oldstable, that's why the tracker shows it as open. If you look > at http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/unstable you > will > see it doesn't show up there.
would it be useful to tag number of issues on a per release basis in the pts to prevent future confusion in this regard? i.e. instead of 3 open issues in silc-toolkit do 3 open issues in silc-toolkit in oldstable 0 open issues in silc-toolkit in stable 0 open issues in silc-toolkit in testing 0 open issues in silc-toolkit in unstable mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
