Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > The sync of NFUs seems to be generally accepted, so we'll continue to do
> > that. Should we continue to attempt to open <unfixed> entries for stuff
> > that is not yet listed in the Debian tracker?
>
> note this is in response to a post from a year ago.
>
> i've implemented a tag called <undetermined> for issues such as this.
> if you would like to use that and include a "TODO: check", i think
> that would be a very useful contribution back to debian.
I agree that would be useful.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
