Hi
*debian-security-tracker *Team !
Wamim here want to report a bug !
Vulnerability :X-Frame-Options Header Vulnerability
Severity:Medium/High.
Afftectd Site : https://*security*-*tracker*.*debian*.org
Technical Details & Description:
The Anti-MIME-Sniffing header X-Content-Type-Options was not set to
'nosniff'. This allows older versions of Internet Explorer and Chrome to
perform MIME-sniffing on the response body, potentially causing the
response body to be interpreted and displayed as a content type other than
the declared content type. Current (early 2014) and legacy versions of
Firefox will use the declared content type (if one is set), rather than
performing MIME-sniffing.
Information :
This issue still applies to error type pages (401, 403, 500, etc) as those
pages are often still affected by injection issues, in which case there is
still concern for browsers sniffing pages away from their actual content
type.
At "High" threshold this scanner will not alert on client or server error
responses.


Solution - Fix & Patch:
Ensure that the application/web server sets the Content-Type header
appropriately, and that it sets the X-Content-Type-Options header to
'nosniff' for all web pages.
If possible, ensure that the end user uses a standards-compliant and modern
web browser that does not perform MIME-sniffing at all, or that can be
directed by the web application/web server to not perform MIME-sniffing
Affected urls :

   - GET: https://crypto.cat/robots.txt
   - GET: https://crypto.cat/sitemap.xml
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/robots.txt
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/sitemap.xml
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/data/fake-names
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/data/missing-epochs
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/data/report
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/data/unknown-packages
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/dtsa-candidates
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/itp
   - GET:
   https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/oldoldstable
   - GET:
   
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/oldoldstable-backports
   - GET:
   https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/oldstable
   - GET:
   
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/oldstable-backports
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/stable
   - GET:
   https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/stable-backports
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/testing
   - GET:
   https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/unstable
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/todo
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/undetermined
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/unimportant
   - GET: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/unreported


   - Well, thanks for your attention, II wait more information about this
   report.
   - Thanks and best regards,
   - Wamim

Reply via email to