debian-security  

Messages by Thread

• Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Holger Levsen
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? debianmailinglists . hz5zm
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Keyserver for gpg.conf ? debianmailinglists . hz5zm
• Fips Module Config Robert A Wooldridge
  • Re: Fips Module Config bhaskarvilles
• Upcoming stable point release (13.2) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (13.2) Adam D. Barratt
• Status of Intel CET in Debian Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Status of Intel CET in Debian Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Status of Intel CET in Debian Emanuele Rocca
• On the status of rust/go packages Sly
  • Re: On the status of rust/go packages Fabian Grünbichler
• BerkeleyDB CVEs Tomáš Macák
  • Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs debianmailinglists . hz5zm
  • Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
  • Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Sylvain Beucler
  • Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Juraj Longauer
  • Re: Re: BerkeleyDB CVEs Jeffrey Walton
• Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Sylvain Beucler
  • Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Sylvain Beucler
  • Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: ftp.debian.org: remove armel from forky and unstable Jochen Sprickerhof
• Upcoming (old)stable point releases: 13.1 and 12.12 Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming (old)stable point releases: 13.1 and 12.12 Adam D. Barratt
• Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages fosres
  • Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Why Does Debian Use PGP to Sign Packages kpcyrd
• Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update Stephan Seitz
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update Stephan Seitz
  • Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5973-1] linux security update Salvatore Bonaccorso
• Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG fosres
  • Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Malte
  • Re: Why Do Developers Continue to Sign with GNUPG Gunnar Wolf
• should the Release Notes be updated concerning trixie security Paul Gevers
  • Re: should the Release Notes be updated concerning trixie security Santiago Ruano Rincón
  • Re: should the Release Notes be updated concerning trixie security Holger Levsen
• Security tracker suggestions Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Security tracker suggestions Roberto C . Sánchez
• Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Noah Meyerhans
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Michael Lazin
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Holger Levsen
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Holger Levsen
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Holger Levsen
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Jeffrey Chimene
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Rob Ward
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Vladislav Kurz
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual debianmailinglists . hz5zm
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Dave P.
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Noah Meyerhans
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual debianmailinglists . hz5zm
  • Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual Dave P.
• DebCamp 25 Security Tracker sprint - planning announcement Roberto C . Sánchez
• SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? c . buhtz
  • Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? Bartosz Fenski
  • Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? Chris Boot
  • Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? c . buhtz
  • Use ~/.ssh/config Stephan Verbücheln
• Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian Fu, Rong (CN)
  • Re: Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • RE: Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian Fu, Rong (CN)
• Upcoming stable point release: 12.11 Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release: 12.11 Jonathan Wiltshire
• Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) Moritz Mühlenhoff
  • Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) NoisyCoil
• Testmail hste
  • Re: Testmail sylvain
  • Testmail Arne Pisch
  • Re: Testmail j V
  • Re: Testmail Álesson Nunes
  • Re: Testmail Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Testmail Meso Security
  • FWD: Re: Testmail hste
  • Strange welcome after a testmail hste
  • Re: Strange welcome after a testmail Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail hste
  • Re: FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail Lupe Christoph
  • FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail hste
• sbuscribe Francesco Buscaino
  • Re: sbuscribe Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen
• Upcoming stable point release: 12.10 Jonathan Wiltshire
• Re: Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source Heinrich Schuchardt
  • Re: Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source Michael Tokarev
  • Re: Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source Michael Tokarev
• Upcoming stable point release: 12.9 Jonathan Wiltshire
• Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update Bjørn Mork
  • Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update Santiago Vila
• (No Subject) Sergey S.
  • Re: (No Subject) Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen
  • Re: (No Subject) Sergey S.
• Securing Debian Manual, Out of Date? debianmailinglists . hz5zm
• Fwd: gnome-settings-daemon breaks existing usbguard rules, allowing all usb device by default jan kapoli
• Re: Bug#539352: /etc/init.d/mountkernfs.sh: Please mount debugfs when available in the kernel Mark Hindley
• I Joined This List David Campbell
  • Re: I Joined This List Jeffrey Walton
• dpkg MD5 David Campbell
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jonathan Hutchins
  • Re: dpkg MD5 David Campbell
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 debianmailinglists . hz5zm
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Simon Josefsson
• Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9 Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9 Adam D. Barratt
• Recording for my DebConf talk about CVEs Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Recording for my DebConf talk about CVEs Sylvain Beucler
  • Re: Recording for my DebConf talk about CVEs Darren S.
• Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Martin
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Leandro Cunha
• bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Lee
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Ondřej Surý
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Ondřej Surý
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski
• Upcoming oldstable point release (11.11) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (11.11) Adam D. Barratt
• Upcoming stable point release (12.7) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.7) Adam D. Barratt
• Bug#1075786: znc.service restarts without warning on upgrade Jesse Rhodes
• Bug#1074468: RM: salt/oldstable-security -- RoSRM; removed from oldstable Jonathan Wiltshire
• Bug#1074467: RM: snort/oldstable-security -- RoSRM; removed from oldstable Jonathan Wiltshire
• RE: Mini-DebConf in Cambridge, UK - October 10-13 2024 Luna Jernberg
• CVE applicability Arul Anand MM
  • Re: CVE applicability Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: CVE applicability Thomas Hochstein
• Upcoming oldstable point release (11.10) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (11.10) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (11.10) Adam D. Barratt
• Re: golang-github-disintegration-imaging: CVE-2023-36308 Nilesh Patra
• Workaround for the GSM privilege escalation vulnerability Stephan Verbücheln
• Re: RFS: paramspider package Samuel Henrique
• Re: RFS: assetfinder package Samuel Henrique
• security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Fw: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Meso Security
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Gian Piero Carrubba
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Gian Piero Carrubba
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Santiago Ruano Rincón
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Roberto C . Sánchez
• xz backdoor prevention and hosts.deny? Nick Sal
  • Re: xz backdoor prevention and hosts.deny? Gian Piero Carrubba
• CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm Richard van den Berg
  • Re: CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm StealthMode Hu
  • Re: CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm piorunz
• Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Gian Piero Carrubba
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Joerg Jaspert
  • Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Jonathan Wiltshire

• Earlier messages