Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >> >>>So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 >>>spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. >> >> I suspect if spamc invokes spamd but spamd reached its max-children >> then spamc will act as if spamd timed out, or report ham. > > That depends on the options you pass to spamc; I pass -x which says > "report a temp failure in that case", and advise that for general use.
I'm not sure if this is helpful to the original poster, but I invoke spamc from within procmail, and use a lockfile to limit it to one invocation at a time. Does anyone see a problem with this setup? (I use exim as my MTA.) Thanks, Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
