>> I think we would need a new distribution e.g. 'sec-stable' for testing >> new security patches. So someone would be able to choose between >> 'more stable but less secure' >> or >> 'less stable but more secure'. > > To me it sounds like 'testing', no ?
No, testing provides too new version of the dependencies. We neither want to include this newer versions in a security release if we don't have to, nor can we rebuild a package from testing on stable and expect the result to work reliably. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
