On 16.03.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, > >> 7. Is our xpdf vulnerable to CAN-2005-0206[13]? > > > > This also needs to be checked for pdftex (in tetex-bin) and > > pdftohtml, and perhaps others that include xpdf code. > > Can anybody point me to a place where I can find the patch for the > 64-bit-specific issue? > I was looking for a while, but couldn't find anything. > I found ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.00pl3.patch - if > that's the right one, tetex-bin in sarge/unstable is vulnerable. > In woody the code looks very different. > Well, the xpdf-3.00pl3.patch was IIRC included in the latest tetex-bin upload (CAN-2005-0064). H. -- If the girl you love moves in with another guy once, it's more than enough. Twice, it's much too much. Three times, it's the story of your life. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
