On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:03:57 +0200 martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who guarantees that? If Cipherblock CB_x depends on CB_(x-1), then > CB_last will indirectly depend on CB_first. If the data are large > enough to span multiple block device blocks, damage to the beginning > of the cipherfile makes the rest of the file unusable, no? That is the reason, why a reasonable clever programmer would not do such a silly thing. -- mit freundlichen Gruessen / with friendly regards Michael Buchholz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
