HMmm well I like it that way... Don't change it till we get a vote...
acs ___________________________ Aaron C. Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 425-865-2268 ___________________________ > ---------- > From: Brad Allen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply To: Brad Allen;Brad Allen > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 4:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Brad Allen > Subject: fw: Returned mail: User unknown [sshd & ssh at same time] > > <<Message: fw: Returned mail: User unknown>> > Here's another complaint about package installation habits vis-a-vis > debian. The excerpt is this, and you can skip the attached parts from > which the quote is derived: > > " the only think that has REALY irked me about debian is they are the only > " linux dstro I know of that doesn't seperate ssh from sshd.. and during the > " install of ssh on debain it turns sshd ON.. if your setting up a box that > " at no point should have even the possibility of being logged into remotely > " and all of a sudden sshd is turned on.. it's realy icky... > " > " blah.. okies.. > " end babble :) > " Chris > " > " /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > " \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -u > > [Well, this time I *mean* to send to the whole list. GPG key isn't > yet distributed, which actually DOES make sense come to think of it > ... yet ANOTHER way to use GPG;: sign everything, and don't give out > either key, -- ahh, but, does it actually make it what I think it is, > harder to make another properly signed message (given some computing > power like quantum or DNA computing power or so)? ... and then, when > some criminal politician or other says "but you wrote THIS!" > slanderous thing, you can just finally release your public key into > public; anyway, I'm in key transition, so that's not the issue, but it > works for now ...] >
