Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 12 February 2001 11:32: >IMHO people of security team shouldn't spend their time to serve >security fixes for testing. People who want to use testing on >security relevant machines should know what they do and should be >able to handle those issues themselves. Those hazardeurs could try >to fix important bugs of the package which is stick to unstable for >whatever reason which would help the whole distribution or backport >the stuff themself.
What's the purpose of testing exactly? If it's a preparation for becoming stable it should obviously include the security fixes, otherwise when the transition testing -> stable happens you're... If it's not a preparation for stable it has no purpose. If this issue isn't explained I'll just move to unstable and ignore testing, because going back to stable is no option.
