On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:27:55PM +0100, Leo Howell wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:30:01PM +0200, Daniel Faller wrote: > > On Monday 02 July 2001 18:25, you wrote: > > > ipmasquerading? > > > > No, they have public ip's and I would like to keep this setting. The > > clients > > config should not change at all. > > Then I would go with bridging all the way. I use it here at home to join > 100baseT and 10base2 ethernet together. I see no reason why you can't set > up a packet filter on the bridge as well. (I may of course be totally > wrong). >
You should also consider to setup 2 bridges with packet filtering enabled ( there is a patch for this, both for the 2.2 and the 2.4 series. I don't remember the url, however). Then, you have an easy way for a fully redundant solution. -- Ducrot Bruno http://www.poupinou.org Page profaissionelle http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com Haume page
