Though I have supported Sendmail in Big-Iron environments, I am now
using the Default Debian Exim to serve mail. I have been happy with
Exim and it has served me reliably. Yet I don't often hear its name
used as an alternative to Sendmail. Usually I hear Postfix or Qmail.
Though I have used all of the MTAs I am referring to, I would like some
quantitative and qualitative feedback. IE, 'I use Exim to serve 3000
people on a measly 486' or 'I used Exim and was cracked open before I
could say Postfix' or 'Exim behaves like a lobatamized turtle.'
I know, I know, use what you feel comfortable with, but how comfortable
are you guys with Exim?
-A. Dave
vdongen wrote:
I don't think the choice of MTA is relevant to the HDD organisation.
I use both Postfix and Qmail and they both work fine.
The only thing you have to realize is when you use Qmail with maildir,
you really need a large /home partition.
Greetz,
Ivo
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show clue
Package: clue
Priority: optional
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:22:07 +0100
Subject: Re: Mailserver HDD organization
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
--
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | They that give up essential liberty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | to obtain a little temporary safety
Encrypted mail preferred | deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Key fingerprint = 9782 04E7 2B75 405C F5E9 0C81 C514 AF8E 4BA4 01C3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]