When woody goes stable, though, I want to move on to whatever "testing" is at that point. That's why I had been using "testing" in my sources.list rather than explicitly saying "woody"; I thought it would make it easier to stay current. Is it better to explicitly state "woody" in your sources.list, and then change it when woody is no longer the name for testing? Thanks.
Tom -----Original Message----- From: Noah L. Meyerhans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:39 PM To: Moti Levy Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Ssh not upgraded when doing apt-get upgrade? On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:35:21PM -0400, Moti Levy wrote: > this line in /etc/apt/sources.list did it for me ... > deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates main contrib non-free You should probably use 'woody', not 'testing'. After all, testing doesn't normally get security updates. Once woody becomes stable, you are still going to want them. Specifiying the distribution by name will get you the updated packages for as long as the security team supports that version. noah -- _______________________________________________________ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
