On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 05:19:06AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > So what to do now?  If /tmp was mounted ro, then none of the attacker's
> > tools could run (from this attack anyway)
> 
> Read Only tmp? :) Now that is a funny idea. I can understand to restrict tmp
> to root or to remove it totally, but why would one want to have it read
> only?

Oops, thinko.  I meant noexec, but you probably realised that.

Dion.

-- 
Dion's Maxim:  If you are ever surprised at just how stupid people can be,
               then you haven't understood Dion's Maxim.

Reply via email to