-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 no name supplied wrote: | On May 27, 2004, at 2:15 PM, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: | |> On 5/27/2004, Luk Claes wrote: |> |>> You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody |>> At least 4 of the 5 you mention are listed there... |> |> Luk -- thank you! Somehow I had no idea that web page existed... | | | Nor did I. It's very good that it's there. However, I am wondering | what the specific reasons are that Woody is not vulnerable to those | particular vulnerabilities. Are there pages explaining that? (Maybe | they should be linked to from that page. [hint hint wink wink])
As mentioned on the page: Common reasons are too old versions in woody or non-existing packages. So, I would think the version in woody is too old to be vulnerable. Cheers Luk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAwDEi5UTeB5t8Mo0RAkSNAKCX8lPoSG8s3cfPZiVoWDkL3weayACgsMHS LZgbNmNiXPG7NGWQgXqxwU4= =bv6V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
