* Peter Palfrader: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > Is there a reason not to simply read the "Precedence: list" header >> > and simply not respond at all ? >> >> "Precedence: list" is non-standard. Technically speaking, >> RFC-compliant software should not use it. 8-/ > > That's not quite correct, software MAY use it.
But it is discouraged to set it (see RFC 2076). Personally, I don't see any problems with evaluating Precedence: headers in autoresponders. However, several large mail vendors used to argue that they do not want to rely on this officially discouraged header. 8-( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
