On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:28:21 +0100 Hector Oron wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/3/31 Riku Valli <[email protected]>: > > > apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at > > Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get. > > > > You should use apt-get with Squeeze and aptitude with Lenny. > > It is recommended on the release-notes for the upgrade from lenny to squeeze. > Aptitude should just work fine on squeeze. > > >>> # aptitude -s upgrade > >>> The following packages will be upgraded: > >>> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60 > >>> libisccfg62 liblwres60 > >>> 8 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > >>> > >>> # apt-get -s upgrade > >>> Reading package lists... Done > >>> Building dependency tree > >>> Reading state information... Done > >>> The following packages will be upgraded: > >>> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60 > >>> libisccfg62 liblwres60 > >>> tex-common > >>> 9 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > >>> > >>> What's the reason for this? > > Can you check which it is the status of tex-common, is it held by any > reason? aptitude frontend it is very good to find out such things. > > In anycase, I believe this conversation belongs to [email protected] > and not [email protected]
If there it turns out there is actually a problem in aptitude, then keeping debian-security in the loop is a good thing, so don't worry about changing mailing list context. This is a fine place for discussion. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
