On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Darius Jahandarie wrote: > This thread is probably not the most apropos place to bring this up, > but I've found parcimonie to be an terribly over-complex > implementation of the (good) design document that they wrote. It > requires pulling in dozens of perl modules, including GTK bindings > (?). > > It worries me that it's starting to become the defacto tool for > keeping a keyring up-to-date, because security is one of the places > where minimalism really matters.
Agreed. I've long thought it should have been written in C and included in GnuPG itself, as gpg-keyring-refresh-daemon or something like that. The GTK stuff is for the parcimonie log viewer for Linux desktop interfaces. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6HiRTyNFkBDX_Hrdi_=WHabS8VXLxJtuGdQY_u=1o+...@mail.gmail.com
