Norman Walsh writes: > / Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Why does it make sense to have xsl-stylesheets version 1.28 and 1.29 > | and 1.30, etc installed? > > Only so that people can easily use 1.29 when they discover that I > totally screwed up 1.30. But I don't feel strongly about it. > I don't have strong convictions either way, just floating the idea... As Adam suggests, we keep the current system - only one version installed at a time. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Mark Johnson
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Adam Di Carlo
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Mark Johnson
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Norman Walsh
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Norman Walsh
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Adam Di Carlo
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Sam TH
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Adam Di Carlo
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Norman Walsh
- Re: packaging questions: docbook-xsl-stylesheets Adam Di Carlo
- Mark Johnson

