Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm surprised that you find this surprising:)
Actually it makes sense. I used to know this but when I gave up maintaining jade/openjade I forgot it all. The only thing that would break would be relative system references in documents which assume prefix of /usr/share/sgml, but I would guess that is rather rare. Anyhow -- are we going to ignore /usr/share/xml or embrace it? Last I heard we're waiting for FHS to opine on the matter, and until then, stick with /usr/share/sgml. I personally don't much see the point of a separate /usr/share/xml but I'm known as something of a fuddy-duddy. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
