Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi folks, > > PSGML, for one, looks when it goes looking for, say, DOCTYPE > HTML, looks at the first hit, even if it gets a HTML 4.01 DTD when > the document read: > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC > "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> > > Please see Bug#156551 for details. > > Is this something that is more general a bug than just psgml?
Hmm, reading TR9401: # The DOCTYPE keyword indicates that an entity manager should use the associated storage object identifier to locate the entity text (to be used as the external subset) for a doctype declaration whose document type name is specified by the entity name spec. Note that a document type declaration that omits the optional external identifier (that points to the external subset) indicates the absence of an external subset; in this case, there is no entity reference to resolve, and no catalog lookup is performed. It is unclear to me whether given a document doctype that has both a catalog PUBLIC match and a DOCTYPE match, which is to be used. Jade obviously uses the PUBLIC in prefernce to the DOCTYPE match, but I don't see any support in the standard for this. I wonder if we should just eliminate the DOCTYPE entry in the catalog entirely. Alternatively, we move the DOCTYPE down to the bottom? It's a little difficult for us to guarantee anything about the ordering of various catalogs from different packages, so I don't even know if this is possible. FYI, the DOCTYPE catalog line is provided by w3c-dtd-xhtml now. If we want that line just removed, we should reassign this bug there I guess. -- ...Adam Di Carlo...<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
