On Sep 18, Ardo van Rangelrooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Neil Roeth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I don't have a particularly strong reason to remove /usr/lib/sgml, but I > > realized if we wait for sarge+1, then that will mean it will exist for a > > couple of years more. If we forget to do something we need to do for a smooth > > transition, then we'd have to wait for sarge+2, which is probably a couple of > > years beyond that. If we can just delete it for sarge without significant > > negative side effects, that'd be great. > > Good points. I would say we start ASAP and see what breaks. That leaves us > time to fix things.
Fine by me. Do you want to try to get more of a consensus that this is what more people than just you and me want to do? -- Neil Roeth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
