> >> My initial thinking was that if a 'package' entry was missing, > >> dh_installcatalogs would simply generate a package catalog based on > >> the info in the 'root' + 'local' entries. > > I don't want to get into the idea of the dh_installcatalogs script > being smart enough to know whether a root entry is missing a package > entry (or vice versa).
I wasn't sure how hard that would be to implement. (I don't know perl.) Kill that idea, then. > > Regarding the idea of a new 'single' command as outlined by Ardo, I > like the idea and I'll make it so. Can we think of a better name for > it, though? I kinda like 'root-and-package' as a command. Yeah, I was thinking along these lines. Kind of the opposite of single, actually. Something that conveys the meaning 'both'. I like root-and-package, too. Unambiguous. Mark -- _____________________________________ Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian XML/SGML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/> GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
