Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I have some questions about where to play stuff in /usr/share/xml as I > move the sgml-data package over to comply with the XML draft policy. > These are questions for Mark in particular. > > Here's what I have so far: > > /usr/share/xml/declaration: > big5xml.decl xml.dcl xml1n.dcl > > /usr/share/xml/entities: > xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/ > > /usr/share/xml/qaml: > catalog catalog.xml qaml-xml.dtd > old location: /usr/share/sgml/dtd/qaml-xml.dtd > > /usr/share/xml/svg: > catalog catalog.xml svg10.dtd svg11.dtd > old location: /usr/share/sgml/dtd/svg10.dtd > > I've opted to put SVG and QAML in their own directories. Putting them > under /usr/share/xml/schema seems to conflict with "3.1.3. Local > Catalogs: /usr/share/xml/.../package-dir/catalog.xml". I would have > to name the catalogs qaml-xml.catalog or something. Note: this feels > like a flaw in XML policy. > > Does this seem ok? correct? > > FYI, of course I'm going to create symlinks from the old locations > under /usr/share/sgml for backwards-compatability.
Why do you have SGML catalogs under /usr/share/xml? I would expect them to be under /usr/share/sgml (together with the symlinks). Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
