On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:19:11PM +0100, Steinar Bang wrote: > >>>>> Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Agreed. I also discovered a bug in 'xmlcatalog', where it requires a > > *system element where the proper implementation of the xml catalog > > spec. would indicate the use of a *uri element. In fact, I had to > > add 'incorrect' entries to the xml-catalog for docbook-xsl just so > > some gtk stuff (which uses 'xmlcatalog') would build properly. > > Have you reported this bug to to the upstream maintainers?
Yep. In the gnome bugzilla. > If we're taking about the xmlcatalog delivered with libxml2, it isn't > a script, it's a C program, Oops, I should've at least looked at the file and figured that out myself. I did see at the bottom the man page that it was written by John Fleck - or maybe that was just the man page itself. Having read that, for some reason I assumed it was a script. Weird, dunno why I made that assumption. At any rate, I filed a very verbose bug report a few days ago. > FWIW, I would have preferred to be able to use xmlcatalog on debian, > as I do on RH. Yeah, makes sense. Heck, xmlcatalog is almost a defacto 'standard'. We just have to figure out how to integrate it with the Debian tools, so user catalog edits via xmlcatalog don't get wiped out by update-xmlcatalog. At least those are my $0.02. I think Ardo & Adam will eventually arrive at means to remove the incompatibility. But they're both super-busy, so it probably won't be tomorrow:) Cheers, Mark -- ------------------------------------- Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian XML/SGML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/> GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
