Neil Roeth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Jun 2, Ardo van Rangelrooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The next version of sgml-base (to be uploaded in the weekend of June 20) will > > drop support for the obsolete and deprecated directory '/usr/lib/sgml'. > > What's the policy for local catalogs, i.e., those created by an admin and > placed in the /usr/local tree? They used to be in /usr/local/lib/sgml, should > they now be in /usr/local/share/sgml? Is it a bug for a package to reference > the former rather than the latter?
Following the FHS 2.3 the official location is /usr/local/share/sgml. That's also what sgml-base creates. So, I would have to say yes, that's a bug. Packages should only reference /etc/sgml, /usr/share/sgml and /usr/local/share/sgml. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
