--- Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Chimene wrote:
Hi,
Is the answer to simply rewrite the SYSTEM identifier in the DOCTYPE declaration?
Yep, that'll work.
Yes, it did/does. I wound up edting the dbforms DTD to reference V4.3 of the docbookx DTD.
Yes, I believe version 1.1 of the dbforms DTD references V4.1.2 of the DocBook XML DTD. When 1.2 is released, hopefully it'll customize V4.4, which is expected to become a committee standard. Either way, you should be able to safely use any DocBook XML DTD with Version >= 4.1.2.
<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook HTML Forms Module V1.1//EN" "dbforms.dtd"!>
I guess I'm surprised that the PUBLIC declaration
doesn't match a catalog entry.
It should. If it doesn't it's my fault (as the package maintainer.)
I have to admit that I'm quite new to XML.
This isn't an XML issue - it's more of a "package maintainer needs to update his package" issue:-) OIW, I need to update that package to make sure that it's registering its DTD in the XML catalog system.
I have some package maintenance to do this weekend, so I'll take a look at the package then.
Yes, that's what I wound up doing. However, it requires hardcoding the DTD location - something that doesn't seem quite right. To make my life easier, should I use update-xmlcatalog to point to the dbforms DTD?
That should do the trick.
-- ____________________________________________________________ Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian XML/SGML: <http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org> Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/> GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
