[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) writes: > Sad but true. (I actually like scheme, and have written jade > "transformation" style sheets for personal dtd's very effectively, yet > that isn't even real DSSSL, that's a jade extension...)
It might be "proprietary" to jade, but it is very powerful. In fact, the jade transformation system a major element inspiring the design of the XSLT. > On the other > hand, my "slideshow" DTD can't really be formatted into slides with > jade, AFAIK; though jade is great to transform it to html for the web > site, the slides are raw PostScript generated by a perl script using > XML::Parser (older versions used SGMLS.) See > http://www.mit.edu/iap/xml/index.html Well, you are saying that for some reason you can't get the print stylesheet to work right, correct? What was the problem/limitation you hit? Was it because of simple-page-sequence? A backend problem? > for the examples. So maybe the "single stylesheet" model is weak; > even for docbook, the print and html DSSSL are separate (related, but > distinct.) This isn't true. You can use the "print" stylesheets to produce HTML/CSS, using the '-t html' backend. It is experimental, and I've never tried it, but I've heard pretty decent things about it. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
