Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Saturday 28 August 1999, at 6 h 21, the keyboard of Adam Di Carlo 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wonder...  do you think I should have named the package docbk
> > instead of docbook-xml ?
> 
> No advice. I would say "When in doubt, follow the upstream author".

Well, I thought it would be more intuitive for the user to have:

   docbook
   docbook-stylesheets
   docbook-xml
   docbook-xsl (not yet packaged)
   ...

But I agree about how it's theoretically better to follow upstream
maintainer.  If anyone feels strongly about this, though, they can
file a bug.

--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply via email to