Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Yes, it does indeed mean that, but since psgml + emacs is the only > > decent editor for XML/SGML that I know of, I think it's necessary. > > What makes a `decent editor' here? I can perfectly edit them in vim > and enjoy features like syntax highlightning as well.
Some means of selecting valid tags in a given context. > > Remember that Emacs20 is standard, isn't it? > > Some emacs is yes, but that doesn't mean it's installed on all systems. > Removing ae, nvi and *emacs* tends to be the very first thing I do on > all my computers :) Yes, but remember that task-sgml is specifically for SGML editors. I just don't think vim cuts it. I've redirected this to the SGML list to see if others agree with you. It's certainly easy enough to remove the psgml requirement -- I just think that would cause more problems and confusion than it would solve. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
