> Looks like this is still sitting in Incoming.  Obviously it's not
> going into potato.

 It's not, but I can't find any reason for not including it. It's an
isolated package, with just one binary, and considered stable by the
upstream author.

> Anyhow, when it gets into woody, let me know, and
> I'll add it to task-sgml ... or would it be task-sgml-dev ?

 task-sgml? wouldn't that be task-xml?

Reply via email to