At 10:11 27/03/00 -0600, Steve Izma wrote: > > ....SNIP....SNIP.... >My opinion about sgml vs xml: sgml is more generic and >thus covers more territory. I don't see why the current hype >about xml should require us to name a package in order to attract >people who don't understand the relationship between the two >standards. And anything properly written in xml won't run into >trouble with current sgml tools. > ...snip....
Hi All For what it's worth (NZ$0.02) i agree totally with Steve here. Renaming or splitting the package is only going to create un-needed work/complexity for the maintainer(s) and that just to cater to ill-informed misconceptions. Besides the description can include the magic three lettered word, no? Enough noise from me cheers pre --------------------------------------------------------------
