[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > It's probably true that creating a DSSSL stylesheet for Linuxdoc > wouldn't be all that complex, but I'm still a little troubled by the > lack of a good text backend. I haven't seen any mass-migration of the > LDP authors to DocBook yet, so I haven't really pushed to get > something better than Lynx.
Does the term "chicken-and-egg problem" ring a bell? There's a better backend-processing candidate for the text stuff (html2text, IIRC), and it's even on the SourceForge SGMLtools-Lite project page as a bug report that this must be implemented. I think that grabbing this bug would be a more useful passtime than writing new stuff for Linuxdoc. -- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/ GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B Forge your CipherSaber and list it: http://www.xs4all.nl/~cg/ciphersaber/
pgpNGPJhKGck4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
