> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin)

> 
> Given that the file is already produced by automatic tools, no,
> converting it to XML doesn't add any magic. *Especially* if the
> conversion can be accomplished by a 100 line script - any tool that
> would benefit from an XML form can just concoct one...
> 
...
> Feel free to prove me wrong by *building* such tools, and showing that
> they do something qualitatively more interesting :-)  XML is cool, but
> it is not a substitute for actual work.

Are you XML-literate?  If not, find out about XSLT.


Danie
-- 
Daniel Barclay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Hmm.  A little worrisome:  http://www.junkbusters.com/cgi-bin/privacy
                            http://www.anonymizer.com/snoop.cgi )

Reply via email to