Quoting Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > / Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | > | > | docbook-simple: includes V4.1.2.4, 4.1.2.1, 3.1.7.1 > | (I left the entity links out for now, > | I can change them when Ardo policizes.) > > I don't understand the comment about entity links, but maybe that's .deb > related. (I sometimes wish SGML hadn't used the term "entity" :-) > Yeah, it is .deb related. I meant that I kept the same directory structure with respect to entities as in your original distribution. And that I used the entity files you provide. This is different from some debian dtd packages that use symlinks to refer to already installed entities.
> Please ditch 4.1.2.1 and 3.1.7.1 from that distribution. 4.1.2.4 is > backwards compatible with those releases, I believe, and I'm trying > to wean them away from the world :-) > Happily. What about the removed titleabbrev and articleinfo elements from versions > 4.1.2.1? Doesn't this removal break the backward compatibility with versions < 4.1.2.1? I'll gladly ditch 'em if you still feel that backward compatability won't break. > | docbook-xsl-stylesheets: v1.25 experimental didn't work correctly. > | Replaced it with v1.24, which works fine. > > What didn't work correctly? > When testing my docbook-xsl-tools package (XT + catalog classes) I kept getting problems with (I think) UTF-8 encoding when using the /html/xtchunk.xsl stylesheet with full DocBook XML 4.1.2. I would get what looked like scandinavian characters (~angstrom a's) with the thingee over the A in place of the prev/next nav links for a one-page document that wasn't supposed to have the links anyway. The output of xhtml/xtchunk.xsl was ok, but I had to change the filename extension from xhtm to html. Doesn't this happen to you?
